Pilots vs Stanford
+5
Harry Redknapp
Dan No Yell
keeper
tugboat annie
A_Fan
9 posters
Page 1 of 1
Pilots vs Stanford
I see the Oregonian is picking up right where it left off last season. Not one word that I could find about tonight's game in the paper today.
A_Fan- All-WCC
- Number of posts : 1539
Location : The country east of Hillsboro.
Registration date : 2007-09-10
Re: Pilots vs Stanford
Good first half last night. Not bad overall. Is Boon injured? What about Lorielle? Kennedy and Young look promising. Also nice to see Rachel Van Hollenbeck in the stands for a busman's holiday.
tugboat annie- Recruit
- Number of posts : 4
Registration date : 2011-09-01
Re: Pilots vs Stanford
Agree, take away the one turnover and it may have ended up 0-0. It was a pretty even game. There were a couple of shaky moments here and there, but for a young team, there were a lot of positives to build on.
Very impressed with Stanford's spacing and ball movement. They also did a good job con defense. The forward that scored the goal was very fast, but the Pilots did a great job containing her.
Good soccer, great fireworks display after, a couple of amusing cheers from the student section, not a bad way to spend a Saturday night.
Very impressed with Stanford's spacing and ball movement. They also did a good job con defense. The forward that scored the goal was very fast, but the Pilots did a great job containing her.
Good soccer, great fireworks display after, a couple of amusing cheers from the student section, not a bad way to spend a Saturday night.
keeper- Bench Warmer
- Number of posts : 144
Registration date : 2010-04-16
Re: Pilots vs Stanford
The Oregonian is still be published?
We have a starting line up. GS did lots of subbing first 3 games with everyone playing. Last night most starters played most of the game.
This is a very promising team. They did a great job.
Can't say they played them even. SU had 3 times as many shots. Since Foxhoven left we have had a hard time taking shots. I would like to see our D put more pressure on the ball. D is much improved since the Kentucky game, but we need to put pressure on the ball, and take away options on inbound passes.
I hope De Hanna is ok. I suspect that she does a better job directing the D than Luty. Both come out for the ball aggressively. Luty has a great foot.
What I really want to say is this:
"With a young team you don't judge them after 12 days of preseason and after playing two top-10 teams, which included a long road trip," head coach Garrett Smith said. "This team is continuing to grow and establish who they are. We're not going to get there overnight, but I think you should really start looking at us a month from now when we get some more games and practices under our belt. The rate that we've improved from the level where we were for the Kentucky game is remarkable.
"We're definitely not comfortable losing, but we played the No. 5 team in the country tonight, made one mistake and they capitalized."
We have a starting line up. GS did lots of subbing first 3 games with everyone playing. Last night most starters played most of the game.
This is a very promising team. They did a great job.
Can't say they played them even. SU had 3 times as many shots. Since Foxhoven left we have had a hard time taking shots. I would like to see our D put more pressure on the ball. D is much improved since the Kentucky game, but we need to put pressure on the ball, and take away options on inbound passes.
I hope De Hanna is ok. I suspect that she does a better job directing the D than Luty. Both come out for the ball aggressively. Luty has a great foot.
What I really want to say is this:
"With a young team you don't judge them after 12 days of preseason and after playing two top-10 teams, which included a long road trip," head coach Garrett Smith said. "This team is continuing to grow and establish who they are. We're not going to get there overnight, but I think you should really start looking at us a month from now when we get some more games and practices under our belt. The rate that we've improved from the level where we were for the Kentucky game is remarkable.
"We're definitely not comfortable losing, but we played the No. 5 team in the country tonight, made one mistake and they capitalized."
Dan No Yell- Bench Warmer
- Number of posts : 150
Location : In the cheap seats
Registration date : 2011-09-22
Re: Pilots vs Stanford
Well said, coach.
Let's see how this team looks after the next 7 games: Dartmouth, Wisconsin, Miami, San Diego State, Oregon State, Seattle and, finally, Washington.
I think that there will be a clearer sense of the starting line up, allowing for injuries, and a better idea of how good they might be heading into conference play.
I missed the game on Saturday so may drive up to Seattle on Sunday morning to offset that!
Let's see how this team looks after the next 7 games: Dartmouth, Wisconsin, Miami, San Diego State, Oregon State, Seattle and, finally, Washington.
I think that there will be a clearer sense of the starting line up, allowing for injuries, and a better idea of how good they might be heading into conference play.
I missed the game on Saturday so may drive up to Seattle on Sunday morning to offset that!
Harry Redknapp- Starter
- Number of posts : 753
Age : 69
Location : NE Portland
Registration date : 2007-09-15
Re: Pilots vs Stanford
I'll see you there.
What about Friday?
What about Friday?
Geezaldinho- Pilot Nation Legend
- Number of posts : 11837
Location : Hopefully, having a Malbec on the square in Cafayate, AR
Registration date : 2007-04-28
Re: Pilots vs Stanford
Dan No Yell wrote:We have a starting line up. GS did lots of subbing first 3 games with everyone playing. Last night most starters played most of the game.
Hopefully, McCluskie isn't out too long, could use her senior leadership on the backline. It will be interesting to see what happens when Boon is ready to play, Kennedy will be tough to keep out of the starting line-up. He may want to start both, so one could end up in the midfield.
My2cents- Recruit
- Number of posts : 69
Registration date : 2012-08-23
Re: Pilots vs Stanford
Didn't know McCluskie and Boon were injured. La Provette didn't come in until there was just about 10 minutes left. Given the over all lack of subbing I suspected it was coaches decision.
Sorry to hear they hurt, glad to hear they will be back. McCluskie is one of my favorite players.
I hope De Haan will be ready sooner. She was in a lot of pain.
Sorry to hear they hurt, glad to hear they will be back. McCluskie is one of my favorite players.
I hope De Haan will be ready sooner. She was in a lot of pain.
Dan No Yell- Bench Warmer
- Number of posts : 150
Location : In the cheap seats
Registration date : 2011-09-22
Re: Pilots vs Stanford
Hey, guess who saw their first Pilots Soccer match last Saturday.....it's WCC Commissioner Lynn Holzman.
DoubleDipper- Pilot Nation Legend
- Number of posts : 11438
Location : Flying, Golfing, or at the Game
Registration date : 2011-11-03
Re: Pilots vs Stanford
any information on de Haan's status?
soccerjoy- Bench Warmer
- Number of posts : 160
Location : Vancouver, WA
Registration date : 2009-11-22
Re: Pilots vs Stanford
Soft boot. No crutches.
Geezaldinho- Pilot Nation Legend
- Number of posts : 11837
Location : Hopefully, having a Malbec on the square in Cafayate, AR
Registration date : 2007-04-28
Re: Pilots vs Stanford
Great and thanks Geez!
soccerjoy- Bench Warmer
- Number of posts : 160
Location : Vancouver, WA
Registration date : 2009-11-22
Re: Pilots vs Stanford
Has Boon been cleared to practice? Will she play this weekend?
soccerjoy- Bench Warmer
- Number of posts : 160
Location : Vancouver, WA
Registration date : 2009-11-22
Re: Pilots vs Stanford
Boone and McClusky did not wear shin guards.
That doesn't necessarily mean a lot. Wetherington didn't wear shin guards last week
That doesn't necessarily mean a lot. Wetherington didn't wear shin guards last week
Geezaldinho- Pilot Nation Legend
- Number of posts : 11837
Location : Hopefully, having a Malbec on the square in Cafayate, AR
Registration date : 2007-04-28
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum